<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 12) The BackPage: Searching with &#8220;Bing&#8221; (or Why We Like Underdogs)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brigada.org/2010/01/24_3890/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brigada.org/2010/01/24_3890</link>
	<description>Resources, trends, and motivation to fulfill the Great Commission</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:19:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Editor</title>
		<link>http://www.brigada.org/2010/01/24_3890/comment-page-1#comment-1179</link>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 12:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brigada.org/?p=3890#comment-1179</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll have to try that search engine Andre. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll have to try that search engine Andre. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ANDRE DE WINNE</title>
		<link>http://www.brigada.org/2010/01/24_3890/comment-page-1#comment-1172</link>
		<dc:creator>ANDRE DE WINNE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 09:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brigada.org/?p=3890#comment-1172</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using Bing for a while and I agree, the pictures are very nice. It does seem to have an edge when it comes to image searches. When it comes to searching for something where you&#039;ll have to do a lot of &#039;refining&#039;, clusty.com is still one of the best because it sorts the results in categories, which helps to speed up the process of filtering and finding what you are really after.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using Bing for a while and I agree, the pictures are very nice. It does seem to have an edge when it comes to image searches. When it comes to searching for something where you&#8217;ll have to do a lot of &#8216;refining&#8217;, clusty.com is still one of the best because it sorts the results in categories, which helps to speed up the process of filtering and finding what you are really after.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

